UltraGS: Real-Time Physically-Decoupled Gaussian Splatting for Ultrasound Novel View Synthesis

ICME, 2026
Yuezhe Yang1, Qingqing Ruan2, Wenjie Cai1, Yufang Dong3, Dexin Yang1, Xingbo Dong1†, Zhe Jin1, Yong Dai4
Corresponding author
1Anhui University, 2Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 3Nankai University, 4Anhui University of Science & Technology

Abstract

Ultrasound imaging is a cornerstone of non-invasive clinical diagnostics, yet its limited field of view poses challenges for novel view synthesis. We present UltraGS, a real-time framework that adapts Gaussian Splatting to sensorless ultrasound imaging by integrating explicit radiance fields with lightweight, physics-inspired acoustic modeling. UltraGS employs depth-aware Gaussian primitives with learnable fields of view to improve geometric consistency under unconstrained probe motion, and introduces PD Rendering, a differentiable acoustic operator that combines low-order spherical harmonics with first-order wave effects for efficient intensity synthesis. We further present a clinical ultrasound dataset acquired under real-world scanning protocols. Extensive evaluations across three datasets demonstrate that UltraGS establishes a new performance-efficiency frontier, achieving state-of-the-art results in PSNR (up to 29.55) and SSIM (up to 0.89) while achieving real-time synthesis at 64.69 fps on a single GPU. The code and dataset are open-sourced at: https://github.com/Bean-Young/UltraGS.

Highlights

  • Achieve real-time ultrasound novel view synthesis at 64.69 FPS.
  • Introduce PD Rendering for attenuation, reflection, and scattering.
  • Release open-source code and a clinical ultrasound dataset.

Method

UltraGS pipeline

Overview of UltraGS with dynamic aperture rectification and PD Rendering.

Primitive representation comparison

Comparison of Gaussian primitive representations for ultrasound scenes.

Results

Quantitative Results

Method Wild Dataset Phantom Dataset Speed (fps)
PSNR SSIM MSE PSNR SSIM MSE
NeRF20.1760.68340.006620.3590.63010.00580.28
TensoRF24.0580.75280.005127.2600.71780.00291.61
Ultra-NeRF19.1400.62180.010925.1150.68140.00420.43
3DGS22.3270.77450.005727.1150.71420.003152.56
SuGaR21.3920.62910.015928.8990.88430.00249.81
Ours25.4540.79690.004329.5500.89660.002064.69

Quantitative comparison on Wild Dataset and Phantom Dataset.

Method Case1 Case2 Case3 Case4 Case5 Case6
PSNRSSIM PSNRSSIM PSNRSSIM PSNRSSIM PSNRSSIM PSNRSSIM
NeRF18.2820.338821.8800.536317.3290.383523.1190.598521.6340.598025.3760.6660
TensoRF17.2060.359322.7870.637819.9990.512422.6810.569222.2520.681626.1580.7389
Ultra-NeRF17.6610.240418.1940.399419.0300.333519.0530.433120.6480.497122.4500.7030
3DGS17.2800.427020.3670.551018.5240.442021.8070.667322.1100.677325.9270.7333
SuGaR18.1700.460123.8310.708520.9020.512823.5410.638120.1350.592327.2640.7721
Ours18.8460.497824.6440.738021.5700.549324.0300.671922.7230.691128.1810.7888

Quantitative comparison on Clinical Dataset.

Qualitative Results

Visual reconstruction comparison on Wild and Clinical Dataset

Visual reconstruction comparison on Wild and Clinical Dataset.

Kidney visualization comparison

Comparison of kidney visualization results from Clinical Dataset.

Ablation Study

Ablation study visualization

Visual reconstruction comparison on ablation study.

Citation

@article{yang2025ultrags,
  title={UltraGS: Gaussian Splatting for Ultrasound Novel View Synthesis},
  author={Yang, Yuezhe and Cai, Wenjie and Yang, Dexin and Dong, Yufang and Dong, Xingbo and Jin, Zhe},
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2511.07743},
  year={2025}
}